A message to Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione

Wow! You certainly have been a busy little boy while we were away for our little weekend mini-vacation, weren't you, Joe? All these posts you made to your blog - must be 40 or 50 at least. And all those posts you've been making to the Medford Patch, Medfordmass, Medford Transcript, Medford Daily Mercury, e-mails to Medford City Council, Medford Police, Medford Body Louse Clinic and all those other very relevant, very important places that you simply must pester ad nauseum! You're accusing everybody of being everybody else and demanding everybody take down everything that they didn't write, post or otherwise utter. And oh, the things that are going to happen to Tv3, the things you are threatening to do to TV3. You sure think you are some kind of very important bigshot (can you say egomaniac? I knew that you could!), don't you, Joe?

Well here's the REAL deal, Joe... you aren't important; not at all; not in the least. It's SUMMER, Joe. Time for fun in the sun. Time for vacation. Time for anything and everything but you! We're going away for the Summer; paying the neighbors to keep an eye on our blog so it doesn't get hacked while we're away, and all those other things one does to rid themselves of all care & responsibilities while they go play all Summer long.

See you at the end of September, perp; if we both survive until then!

A New Notice in the 32 Riverside Ave window

Public figure Joe Viglione take note: there is a new notice in the window of Tv3 Medford at 32 Riverside Ave in Medford Square that you will want to read. No, it's not a "Joe Viglione Wanted Poster."

Actually it's more like a "Joe Viglione NOT Wanted" poster.

Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione does not understand the complete nature of his ban from TV3 Medford

On public figure Joe Viglione's Blog yesterday he wrote a blog entry with the following title:

DELUCA ALLEGEDLY ADMITS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WITH 40 CANAL STREET!

No, Joe, there's no confidentiality agreement with 40 Canal St. You misinterpreted why Arthur DeLuca isn't telling you about it. Since there is no confidentiality agreement involved with Tv3's ban on you; let me explian it to you in simpler words than may have been presented to you in the past.

You can't use TV3 Medford in any way, shape or form. You are not entitled to be a part of Tv3 or of anything about Tv3. You have no privileges whatsoever when it comes to Tv3 Medford. You have no rights whatsoever when it comes to Tv3 Medford. What all this boils down to in relevency here, is that you, public figure Joseph Viglione have no right to receive any information whatsoever from TV3; including public information that is easily available elsewhwere. No one from TV3 has to tell you about their past, present or future. No one from Tv3 has to answer any questions you ask at the City Council meetings. No one from Tv3 has to answer any questions you ask on your blogs. No one from Tv3 has to answer any questions you ask on the Medford Patch. No one from Tv3 has to answer any questions you ask on any yahoo groups. No one from Tv3 has to answer any questions you ask anywhere at any time. This is the degree to which you have been banned from TV3, Joe. And best of all, Joe:

NO ONE representing TV3 Medford will give you any information, Joe.

Mayoral candidate John Byers continues to make a complete and utter fool out of Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione?

On public figure Joe Vigliones blog yesterday he wrote:

HERE ARE DELUCA'S LIES, IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE ACCOUNT GIVEN US BY ANOTHER CANDIDATE WHO DELUCA PHONED AND HARASSED TODAY JUNE 21, 2013, THE FIRST DAY OF SUMMER, THE FIRST YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF FRANK PILLERI'S SIGNATURE ON YET ANOTHER GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT PILLERI HAD NO INTENTION OF ABIDING BY

Yes, Joe... John Byers lied to you again; or Anthony D'Antonio lied to you if you've decided to switch your long-standing story from "John is in Telephone contact with Arthur DeLuca to "Anthony D'Antonio is in telephone contact with Arthur DeLuca". Or perhaps you mean "Michael McGlynn is in telephone contact with Arthur DeLuca" Or perhaps you don't mean a mayoral candidate but a City Council or School Committee candidate? Well as that comedian (was it Norm Crosby or Stanley Myron Hendleman?) on the Golddiggers TV show of the 60's said when he was giving his version of a Shakespeare play quote; "Nay, nay... it ain't none a dem things!"

So when you further state:

THE PROBLEM WITH DELUCA'S LIE TO THE PUBLIC HE WANTS TO BE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER OF IS THAT THIS 5:16 PM ESSAY IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT ALLEGEDLY WITH WHAT DELUCA TOLD ANOTHER CANDIDATE ON THE PHONE

THE LYING CANDIDATE, ARTHUR ALAN DELUCA

If any candidate actually called you and told you they spoke to Arthur DeLuca and he told them these things; then the lying candidate is actually the one you spoke to. But more than likely no candidate gave you an account and you just lied to the public again, Joe. After all two courts of law have said in their official rendered decisions of lawsuits TV3 filed against you, that you, Joesph Viglione of 59 Garlfield Ave Medford Ma 02155, LIE.

So if some other political candidate did not make a fool out of you, Joe... then you made a fool out of yourself!

Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione actually admits on his own blog to his willful defamation of TV3 Medford

This one is almost beyond belief, people; that Joe Viglione would be so monumentally STUPID as to publicly publish this; but here it is, right from public figure Joe Viglione's own blog :

THE TOWN OF HINGHAM REFERENCES MEDFORD AS HOW NOT TO RUN ACCESS! Irma Lauter directed the Committee’s attention to two documents describing the City of Medford’s difficulties with its non-profit community cablevision operating and management corporation.

• “Report on present state of Public Access Television in the City of Medford” by City Solicitor Mark E. Rumley, dated February 10, 2008

• “Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. and TV3 Medford Hearing Results, Findings, and Recommendations” by Hon. Marie O. Jackson Thompson, dated August 5, 2009

Joe, you had this placed on that committee's agenda and brought those documents to their committee yourself to be discussed and entered into their public record, just the way you do at Medford City Council Meetings. That's why it's there. Now you have the gaul to pass it off here like the town wanted to discuess this on their own. And you think your readers are stupid enough to believe you.

But you've given us a simply wonderful idea, Joe. We're going to compile a factual dossier on you of all the lies you've posted, all the court cases you've been involved in and lost, etc etc etc. We're going to give it to Tv3, along with a list of every City & town your show plays in (so nicely provided by you on one of your websites) and then they will take it to each of those cities & towns, have themselves placed on their Council agendas, and then they will discuss in great detail what these cities and towns need to be prepared for when they finally cross you and you begin your savage attacks on each of them.

Some advise for Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione

On public figure Joe Viglione's blog yesterday, he wrote and wrote and wrote.
On the Medford Patch yesterday public figure Joe Viglione wrote and wrote and wrote.
On public figure Joe Viglione's e-mail accounts yesterday he wrote and wrote and wrote.
On various other internet public posting places yesterday public figure Joe Viglione wrote and wrote and wrote.
To his "friends" yesterday public figure Joe Viglione talked and talked and talked
To government officials yesterday public figure Joe Viglione talked and talked and talked
To law enforcement yesterday public figure Joe Viglione talked and talked and talked
To Public access boards of directors yesterday public figure Joe Viglione talked and talked and talked
To attorneys yesterday public figure Joe Viglione talked and talked and talked
To anyone who would listen yesterday (and even to those who wouldn't) public figure Joe Viglione talked and talked and talked

Well keep it up, Joe... you're starting to actually believe your own bullshit. and YOU know it's all lies! You're hilarious!

Notice a similarity between these two blog posts?

On public figure Joe Viglione's blog yesterday at 2:33 PM, he made a blog entry which can be found on the following link:

http://medfordinformationcentral.blogspot.com/2013/06/city-hall-reportedly-ripping-at-medford.html

On our blog yesterday at 12:41 PM, nearly two hours earlier, we made a blog entry which can be found at the following link:

http://informationcentralmeford.blogspot.com/2013/06/two-faced-wincam-employee-public-liar.html

Notice the similarities? To our readers who were of the mind that Joe Viglione did not know of the existence of our blog; you need to change your mind. Obviously public liar Joe Viglione does know of this blog.

To Joe Viglone who may possibly have no mind at all (very doubtful - if he had no mind, he couldn't be changing it, which he does do & often); Joe, you need to change your underwear!

More of Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione' lies exposed!

On public liar Joe Viglione's blog this morning he lyingly writes:

The tough questions were asked of the station that had to leave 40 Canal Street under a cloud of suspicion ten years ago. You can't get a straight answer out of the TV3 President, Frank Pilleri, who claimed the building was going to be "razed." It wasn't. It was just that ...suddenly ...a beautiful studio was no longer functioning and ...suddenly ...the city's property was on the curb being thrown out with the trash.

No tough questions Joe; not questions at all, really. Everyone (but you it seems - unless you're lying again - are you?) knows whathappened. Tv3 Comcast contract was up. The new contract hadn't yet been signed. Tv3 was committed to being aprt of the Medford Arts center building project. They could not acquire a place to stay of their own, therefor could not renew a term lease with the landlord. They had to pay month by month. It was winter; cold; hig fuel bills. The terms of the old contract switched from a lump sum annual payment to a monthly patyment. The landlord also doubled the rent. Tv3 remained their for awhile but the montly costs exceeded the monthly payments. Remaimng was draining their reserves. They had to leave before they went broke, and so they had to suspend studio operations. The landlord was emptying all his proprties (the warehouse units behind the studio building), making way for his planned highrise apartment complex. The studio building was going to be the "superintendent's" headquarters. While TV3 was working with the artists to create an Art Center, in between that time and the time the project went bust (freeing Tv3 to pursue acquiring their own space), the real estate business also went bust. The landlord abandoned his plans and re-rented the Canal St building. It was n longer available when Tv3 was free to look for a place. That wouldn''t have mattered much anyhow as all the equipment had to be removed, all the wires pulled out etc (and new tennents rebuilt the interior). Even if they could have re-rented the building (which they couldn't) the ciosts to put it back in shape would have made it no more attractive than any other place.

But you already know that Joe. You made these false allegations at the time of the performance evaluation hearing. Mark Rumley investigated, found the truth and easily determined MCC had not acted improperly. This was a;so public revealed at that time. You Know this yey you make these same lying accusations again. Tthat's because you, public liar Joe Viglione are an adjudged libeller and pretty much all you do is tell lie after lie after lie!

Two-faced Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione lies again

On public figure Joe Viglione's blog this morning he repeats one of the lies he told at last night's City Council meeting. He writes:

The fellow wrote to Mr. Pilleri to get the tape on the air and Pilleri didn't send membership forms, failed to sign up the members of the band and the producer, did no outreach when outreach came directly to him.

If public figure (and public liar) Joe Viglione were to repeat the actual story, it would reveal that at the time he originally alleged this incident; Tv3 Medford was between studios at Canal St to 5 High st. (and between City Contracts) There was nothing to join, no terms had been set, Therefore no one could be a member & have anything played. At that time TV3 played archive inventory tapes of old shows that they had a co-copyright in and could legally cablecast. Mr Viglione would have you believe something nefarious was going on, but the only thing nefarious is Joe Viglione himself.

By the way Joe, last night was not a trial, it has no legal standing. It was just the City Council making a request of the mayor; the same request you have been making to the mayor for the past ten years. If it had been an actual trial, your "testimony" about that incident would have been inadmissable as heresay. When it came down to actual trials between you and MCC, at no time did you ever win any money from Tv3. At no time was any punishment given to Tv3. At no time did the court rescind your ban from Tv3. At no time did you leave the court with more than had when you came in to it. But TV3 did win money from you. Tv3 did get a judgement of libel commited by you against it. Tv3 did get a statement from the judge that you know nothing about business. Tv3 did get a statement from the judge that you know next to nothing about public access. Tv3 did get a statement from the judge that "no respectible segment of the community would ever believe you." This written document from the judge will stay with their publicly available records. This written document from the judge will stay with you for the rest of your life!

Mike McGlynn is a respectable person; he does not believe you. Mark Rumley is a respectable person; he does not believe you. Bob Maiocco is a respectable person; he does not believe you. Bob Penta believes you; he is NOT a respectable person. You, Joe Viglione believe you; you are not a respectable person. Well what do you know - the judge was right! It works! You, Joe Viglione are a public liar and that is on public record FOREVER!

Dipshit Joe Viglione doesn't know campaign finance laws

On public figure Joe Viglione's blog last night he wrote:

Now do the simple math...McGlynn has had a lot of events we've been at..."Medford Update" at City Hall, Verizon Announcement at Medford High School, etc. etc. and usually you have Jack Dempsey...but, suddenly, from out of the blue...as the TV3 thing heats up...the Mayor hires his old buddy Joe Fortunato to take pictures at Carroll's Restaurant.

Hey Joe, when McGlynn uses Jack Dempsey, it's for City business covering City events. McGlynn's campaign kick-off is not City business. It would be against campaign laws to use Jack for that purpose. McGlynn has always used Joe Fortunato as his personal photographer. Everyone who's seen McGlynn at these things knows that - except you apparently.

Sheesh! get a clue, will you, Joe?

Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione can't count

On public figure Joe Viglione's blog last night he wrote:

On June 18th, 2013 Camuso saw no friends of TV3 in the audience. ON the contrary, the audience was filled with people who were outraged at what they called an INCOMPETENT STATION.

hey, Joe... everyone watching on Tv tonight (and who catch the replay later in the week) could plainly see that there were maybe 25 people total there in Alden Chambers, which seats well over 200 people. If that's what you call "filled", remind me to never buy a Bavarian Creme doughnut from you.

Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione and his playmates at the City Council tonight

We watched public figure Joe Viglione at the City Council tonight. He brought with him his gang of revolutionaries for the coup he wants to pull at TV3 Medford. Really, Joe.. that's it? That's all you could get to join you for your big moment? Those are your only followers loyal enough to support you tonight? Not even John Byers, the mayoral candidate was there. Oh that's right - there was a Red Sox game on TV tonight. Everyone knows John won't leave his important sports for something as menial as his campaign run for the Mayor's seat, even to bask in the limelight of your great final ultimate victory over Tv3. We see that Andrew Castignetti baled after he had his say on the Everett Casino - good for him! And Chris Donovan's wife probably wouldn't let him come out and play with his friends after supper. Of course we understand about Carl "Ziggy Bush" Galusi's absence. As you've pointed out elsewhere, he's deathly afraid of getting sued - but you never did say sued by who - was it by TV3 or by YOU, Joe? So sorry your buddy xxxx Lubell couldn't show either. Working late, or building his own band of revolutionaries to coup you with? The remaining three of "the Great Eight" were never with you in the first place; they were just using you to get what they wanted. But they've found secure jobs elsewhere since then. Jobs paying way more than the franchise fee's budget here can pay them; so they'll be no help to you - they're too smart to get involved with you again. Oh, we saw your "dream team" wishlist (which you claim was set-in-stone real) of the new TV3 board with you as station manager. Don't you know that Malden Access rules do not permit their employees (such as Ron Cox) from serving on the board of another City's access station?

So you six are going to manage to run TV3; I'm saving up my pennies so I can pay for a membership. What date do you anticipate opening - the Twelfth of Never?

Ho Hum... another day, another dollar

You know what it means, Joe

Clueless Wincam employee (soon to be Ex-employee?) public liar Joe Viglione still doesn't understand the PEG franchise fees

On public figure Joe Viglione's blog last night he wrote the following about the cable franchise fee:

As a follow up to my June 14 essay, Building an Access Television Station for the city of Medford, readers may want to know where the monies for Public, Educational and Governmental Access TV come from (P/E/G is the sort-of acronym, with slash marks in between.) It is the franchise fee on your cable TV bill and it is found on two separate lines on your bill if you have Comcast. The director of operations for Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. stated on May 21, 2013 to the City Council that it was a mere thirty five cents, and he stated this as if it were a fact. The fact is that the two fees on one recent bill were Sixty Eight cents for the "Franchise Related Cost" (almost double the small 35 cent figure given to the community by TV3) as well as an additional $3.97 for what is called the Franchise Fee under TV. So that's $4.65 total, and hold onto that number as we explore the cable subscriber base and do a little arithmetic.

If the cable company agrees to wire more classrooms for cable, if they agree to buy police cruisers for the city, If they agree to by a fire engine for the city if they agree to etc etc etc, in order to get a contract with The City to provide cable TV; all these things they charge back the combined cost of to the ratepayer as "franchise related costs".

And Tv3's station manager was talking about only the public access portion of the franchise fee in that City Council discussion; the portion that Bob Penta claims the ratepayers are entitled to a reimbursement for. That's 1/5th of the franchise fee. This fee is 5% of the cable only portion of the bill. It doen't include the telephone and internet portion. Many people (such as seniors on a fixed income) have the "limited basic" service, which is around $12-$13. One percent of $13 (which is TV3's 1/5th of the 5%) comes to only 13 cents for these subscribers. So taking 1/5th of the combined single franchise fee that goes to PEG comes a lot closer to the 35 cent figure given to the City Council than the inflated figure you are estimating, Joe.

I'm surprised you don't already know all this Joe, since you claim to be such a big expert on PEG what with all the years you put into it. Just goes to prove the judge in Woburn court was right on when he wrote that you know nothing about business and next to nothing about PEG.

Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione thinks he's going to win - he's a funny man

Two very old sayings come to mind which very much apply to Joe Viglione.

1) Oh what a tangled web we weave
when first we practice to deceive!

2) Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
The Shadow knows!

Meltdown! for Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione

WOW!!! Have you seen how public figure Joe Viglione has been running around crazy on his blogs, on the Medford Patch and probably on private e-mails trying to put on his best spin control as Arthur DeLuca from TV3 has been blowing holes in every one of his lies with documented facts! Joe Viglione just keeps throwing out more trash like:

QUOTE: "I know we censor, but I don't care, as long as my show gets played." Arthur Alan Deluca to a station outside of Medford

Which, of course, Arthur DeLuca never said. Notice Joe Viglione doesn't state when this happened, which station it happend at and who Arthur said it to? That's because:
A) Arthur DeLuca never said that. and
B) If Joe stated that "information", anyone could just call the station, talk to the person and learn that Joe Viglione had lied yet again

Give it up Joe. Like Arthur DeLuca has posted to your lying article on the Medford Patch,

We won a libel lawsuit against you Joe. The Court decided that you do lie. Even in the Woburn suit we lost, the judge said what you wrote was untrue. He just didn't think it was defamatory because he didn't think anyone would believe, you so he decided Dawn wasn't defamed. Do you understand this, Joe? A judge has stated that he does not think anyone will believe your writings. Why the Patch allows someone a judge says will not be believed write stories for them is a mystery. You have Z-E-R-O credibility!

To which we add. these rulings are going to follow you for the rest of your life, Joe. What a thing to have on your job resume, that a judge has decreed that no one will believe you - oops let me quallify that by stating it the way the judge did. "upon taking your writings as a whole, no respectable segment of the community will believe them".

Got that Joe? No respectable people will believe you, only other assholes like yourself will believe you. And this is coming from a judge!

We were just wondering

Hey Joe, we were just wondering... sort of hypothetical, you understand... but if a City Councillor like say... Bob Penta... were to be blackmailed by a public figure like say... Joe Viglione... and if this public figure were to be caught at blackmailing him... and if this public figure were to be arrested for blackmailing him... and if this public figure were to be prosecuted for blackmailing him... and if this public figure were to be convicted for blackmailing him... what do you think his sentence would be, Joe? How much time do you think he'd have to serve, Joe? What prison do you think they'd send him to, Joe? How do you think this public figure would feel about going to jail for blackmailing him, Joe?

We're just wondering if you know the answer to this "hypothetical", Joe. Do you, Joe?

Wincam employee public liar desn't know the answer to his own questions, but we do!!!

On public figure Joe Viglione's blog tonight he writes:

Why was Martha Coakley in Winchester? At a certain TV station?

Is Martha checking out how the competition works next door?

Gee, isn't it rather coincidental that Martha Coakley was in Winchester behind the high school at a TV station...

breaking news...

Do stay tuned....

(Does it have anything to do with the non-profit's division in touch with this editor by personal letter just a couple of days before....OK...stuff even Johnny doesn't know....do stay tuned...like M.P. said..."This is going to be fun!")

Well we know why she was there, Joe. Were you aware of the documents she brought with her, Joe? Were you aware whether or not she had a copy of the Woburn Court Judge's papers on his findings of the Natalia Vs. Viglione lawsuit, Joe? You know the one we mean Joe; it's the one where the judge said you obviously know nothing about business, almost nothing about public access and have a self aggrandizing opinion of your own self importance, Joe. It's also the report that says no respectable segment of the community would believe anything you say, Joe. You do remember that part of the report, don't you, Joe?

You don't? Gee, that's funny - because WE do, Joe. And I'm sure Martha Coakley does, too, Joe. It's kind of hard for the State Attorney General to forget something like that once she's read it, Joe. Now don't you think that the State Attorney General would be very concerned upon learning that a public school in her State would hire such an unqualified person (as the judge has determined that you are) to be hired by them, Joe? Don't you think that Martha Coakley would be concerned that such a person (meaning you, Joe) would be paid by them, Joe? Don't you think that Martha Coakley would be concerned that they are using ratepayer's (the public who votes for her position) money in such a wasteful fashion as to hire and pay such an obvious incompetent (as the judge so determined you to be, Joe) to administer Public Access to them, Joe? Don't you think that Martha Coakley wants to see what kind of negligent individuals would do such a thing to the City of Winchester, Joe? Don't you think that if Martha Coakley personally went to Wincam to check this all out that someone in Wincam is in deep trouble, Joe?

And don't you think that someone like us would have supplied Martha Coakley with that copy of the judge's decision and tipped her off about how you are defrauding the City of Winchester, Joe? What's that you say, Joe? You don't think so? Well that's funny, BECAUSE WE DO! So we're not going to worry about Martha Coakley's visit to Wincam, Joe; but YOU SHOULD!!!

Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione's impotent limp ultimatum

On public figure Joe Viglione's blog being written as we type these words, he writes:

Frank Pilleri hands in his resignation or he can face LITIGATION

Joe, Frank picks L for Litigation - if you have the balls to go through with it, you impotent little shrimp.

Wincam employee public liar Joe Viglione gets sexually excited anticpating speaking before the City Council next Tuesday

Have you read public figure Joe Viglione's blogs this morning? Oh he is so excited over the prospect of TV3 Medford's demise next Tuesday at the City Council meeting, that he's getting sexually aroused. He probably has a boner right now as he types out more about it; his fingers carressing the keys as a lover's gentle touch carresses the erogenous zones of their partner!

The Tv3 staff is probably going to have to hose down the 32 Riverside Ave building front again after public figure Joe Viglione gets through re-christening it. Hey Joe, when you get up to the podium Tuesday night, try not to jack off in front of the cameras, okey?