The tough questions were asked of the station that had to leave 40 Canal Street under a cloud of suspicion ten years ago. You can't get a straight answer out of the TV3 President, Frank Pilleri, who claimed the building was going to be "razed." It wasn't. It was just that ...suddenly ...a beautiful studio was no longer functioning and ...suddenly ...the city's property was on the curb being thrown out with the trash.
No tough questions Joe; not questions at all, really. Everyone (but you it seems - unless you're lying again - are you?) knows whathappened. Tv3 Comcast contract was up. The new contract hadn't yet been signed. Tv3 was committed to being aprt of the Medford Arts center building project. They could not acquire a place to stay of their own, therefor could not renew a term lease with the landlord. They had to pay month by month. It was winter; cold; hig fuel bills. The terms of the old contract switched from a lump sum annual payment to a monthly patyment. The landlord also doubled the rent. Tv3 remained their for awhile but the montly costs exceeded the monthly payments. Remaimng was draining their reserves. They had to leave before they went broke, and so they had to suspend studio operations. The landlord was emptying all his proprties (the warehouse units behind the studio building), making way for his planned highrise apartment complex. The studio building was going to be the "superintendent's" headquarters. While TV3 was working with the artists to create an Art Center, in between that time and the time the project went bust (freeing Tv3 to pursue acquiring their own space), the real estate business also went bust. The landlord abandoned his plans and re-rented the Canal St building. It was n longer available when Tv3 was free to look for a place. That wouldn''t have mattered much anyhow as all the equipment had to be removed, all the wires pulled out etc (and new tennents rebuilt the interior). Even if they could have re-rented the building (which they couldn't) the ciosts to put it back in shape would have made it no more attractive than any other place.
But you already know that Joe. You made these false allegations at the time of the performance evaluation hearing. Mark Rumley investigated, found the truth and easily determined MCC had not acted improperly. This was a;so public revealed at that time. You Know this yey you make these same lying accusations again. Tthat's because you, public liar Joe Viglione are an adjudged libeller and pretty much all you do is tell lie after lie after lie!
No comments:
Post a Comment